Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 00:04

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Is Beehiiv better than Substack?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
‘Dirty Dozen’ 2025: The 12 Most Contaminated Fruits and Vegetables - Food & Wine
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Matted Dog Lived Alone On A Rooftop For Years — Then Hope Arrived - The Dodo - For Animal People
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
New Study Reveals the #1 Sleep Mistake That Harms the Brain - AOL.com
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
The "Tooth Hurty" Joke Has Its Origins In Ancient, Armored Fish - Defector